Interesting Observations/Facts/Questions about Quantum Leap

Quote:
What if Sam leapt into somebody who stuttered

He did, remember? Will Kinman.
It has been a very long time since I watched the episode, but if I remember correctly Sam stammered for part of the episode, but then after they'd made love the second time he 'became himself' and the stammer was gone.
Someone will no doubt correct me on the details - as I say, it has been years since I watched the episode and my memory always was somewhat Swiss cheesed.
 
Quote:
What if Sam leapt into somebody who stuttered

He did, remember? Will Kinman.
It has been a very long time since I watched the episode, but if I remember correctly Sam stammered for part of the episode, but then after they'd made love the second time he 'became himself' and the stammer was gone.
Someone will no doubt correct me on the details - as I say, it has been years since I watched the episode and my memory always was somewhat Swiss cheesed.

Yep. And you're right about the details.
 
Quote:
What if Sam leapt into somebody who stuttered

He did, remember? Will Kinman.
It has been a very long time since I watched the episode, but if I remember correctly Sam stammered for part of the episode, but then after they'd made love the second time he 'became himself' and the stammer was gone.
Someone will no doubt correct me on the details - as I say, it has been years since I watched the episode and my memory always was somewhat Swiss cheesed.

Correction not needed, you nailed it.
Will controlled most of his emotions as well as his speech for half the episode until he did it with Abigail.
 
That's not really what I meant though. We'll use Will as an example. Once Sam's mind stopped merging with Will's, Sam stopped stuttering. But would Will's aura still make it sound like he is stuttering to everyone else?
 
Here is my "Blind Faith" segment...

Greetings to all our Leaping Listeners… Or is it Listening Leapers? While watching “Blind Faith” something stuck out at me, and in my mind it branched off into a number of theories, which I felt deserved discussion in this segment. We are told by Al that Michelle was the fourth victim of the strangler and that Sam is there to prevent her murder. Why is it that Sam leapt to save Michelle and only Michelle, when if he had leapt to a slightly earlier point in time, he could have attempted to stop the strangler before he killed anyone? I’m sure if Sam had known that the sexy French lady was to be a victim, for example, he’d have done something to try to save her (he certainly liked perving on her while he was disguised as being blind – a scene I loved by the way because it showed that Sam is human and has human urges, a fact which is diminished as time goes on…) I am sure there are numerous behind-the-scenes reasons for Michelle being the only one saved, such as the writers wanting to make the story more personal by focusing on Michelle and her long-suffering mother, while Sam has to pretend to be blind (which, by the way, is more proof that it is Sam’s body leaping around, and not just his mind or consciousness, since if he was stuck in Andrew’s body, he’d be using Andrew’s useless eyes and so would not be able to see…), and to give Scott Bakula a chance to show off more of his musical skills, but because we all get so engrossed in the Quantum Leap Universe, I wanted to come up with some in-universe answers…

In my mind, there appears to be two factors which affect the missions which Sam attempts. The first is what God/Time/Fate/Whatever (GTFW) wants changed, and the second is what Sam is actually capable of doing. From each of these, numerous other minor things come into play as well.
Starting off with GTFW, we need to consider whether there is some sort of “Grand Design”, and whether each person has some destiny that needs to be carried out, or whether all of history is just a mass combination of each person’s choices. It might seem odd to talk about destiny and things being predetermined, on a show that is all about changing history for the better. But when we say that Sam “puts right what once went wrong”, it is worth wondering if there had originally been something that was planned (considered right) by some outside force (GTFW) and that there is some outside force messing things up (for example, the Devil)? And if that is the case, then Sam would be more like the space-time-continuum’s clean-up crew. If there is not any Grand Design then that would mean that Sam is more like a teacher, or a guide, helping people to make better decisions and preventing or punishing those who are determined to do the wrong thing…

I’ll come back to the idea of a Grand Design later, but if there is something that is supposed to be carried out, which for some reason didn’t, that would mean that GFTW had plans for Michelle, and that her destiny hadn’t been carried out yet – maybe she was destined to do something major herself, or influence another person to do so. This is not to say that the other three lives were any less important, just that perhaps their destinies had already come to pass. I personally believe that since Michelle was studying to be a nurse, and this is something she seemed passionate about and was one of the few things that her mother approved of, that she did end up becoming a great nurse and ended up helping to save a lot of lives. Getting back onto the topic at hand, which is “why couldn’t Sam save everyone?” we have to remember that saving Michelle’s physical life wasn’t the only thing Sam was there to do. He also had to make sure that Michelle could live her life as she chose. If Sam had leapt into the area some time earlier and HAD managed to stop the strangler earlier, then he would not have been in any position to carry out this secondary mission, which would be vital should Michelle have some destiny that needs to be carried out.

The ripple effect is prevalent in Quantum Leap, and to use a quote from the show, “the lives Sam touched, touched others, and those, others…” so Michelle probably did end up touching the lives of many that she encountered, and while we’re on the subject of ripples, let’s consider all the other people that were affected by Sam’s intervening as well. First, there’s Michelle’s mother. All she really had in her life was Michelle, which is probably why she was so smothering to begin with. It is said that death is always hardest on those who are left behind, and in the original history, she would have had to deal with her only daughter’s murder. She would probably have ended up with severe depression, could have turned to alcohol or drugs to try to numb the pain, or even ended up as a vigilante, her life now consumed with bringing the strangler to justice. What sort of a life is that to live? Then in the brief period after Michelle is saved but before Sam talked to her about how she was treating Michelle, she probably had just gone back to smothering Michelle, maybe even more-so considering the near-death experience. Nothing will change until Sam does something to change it after all. But finally, now that Andrew and Michelle are together, she is liberated of her responsibility of taking care of Michelle. I would hope that she would use her new spare time to enjoy her life, and do some good, because ultimately she is a good person. Speaking of Andrew and Michelle, if (as Sam had predicted), they did end up married, then they probably had children, and with such good people as their parents, how could they not end up doing good things too?

To finish on the discussion of the ripple effect, there is always the possibility of a negative ripple. In time-travel works, it’s often referred to as the “Killing Hitler” risk. The idea is that if you could go back in time and kill Hitler before he could rise to power, then theoretically you would save over six million people. But who’s to say that one of those people is not worse than Hitler, and would end up doing even worse things? The same thing could happen here, it’s possible (however unlikely) that one of the strangler’s first three victims was a complete psychopath and if allowed to live, could perform monstrous acts even worse than those of the strangler. I personally do not subscribe to this theory in the Quantum Leap universe, because it would invalidate the basic message of trying to change history FOR THE BETTER, but it is still not impossible. A conversation between Stewie and Brian from Family Guy comes to mind – they have travelled back in time ten years and Stewie warns Brian not to change anything because it could have consequences neither of them could imagine, and when Brian asks where he learnt that, Stewie replies “Quantum Leap”, which baffles Brian considering the fact that Sam changed history all the time…

The other major factor that comes into play when it comes to what Sam is able to change, is Sam’s own abilities and limitations. It is lucky that he is in peak physical health, with full vision and hearing, has training in martial arts, and is incredibly intelligent. That puts him in a better position to get through adversity than a lot of the people he has replaced. But he still has some limitations. The first is the situation itself which leads up to the event to be changed. The first three victims were murdered while walking alone in the park. With nobody else around, there was nobody for Sam to leap into to protect these women, and also if he had leapt into the victims themselves, then HE risks being the one who is murdered. Theoretically he could just stay home, but with the strangler determined to kill, that just means some other innocent person would become his target.
The other major limitation is the information that is available in his own time that Ziggy is able to access. It’s very likely that in the original history, the strangler was never caught (if he was, then surely Al would have told Sam who it was…) and so how would Sam know who to look out for and to try to stop before they went on their rampage? So it makes perfect sense that Sam would leap into Andrew Ross. As the closest person to Michelle at the time, maybe Andrew had originally tried to walk Michelle home, but without his eyesight, couldn’t do anything to stop the strangler when he attacked? Even though Sam was blind when he saved Michelle, he had two extra sets of eyes to see for him (Al’s and Chaupin’s) and so this really was the only possible way to stop the strangler. Now this brings up another good point, once Sam did catch the strangler, it would show up in the records, so why couldn’t Sam then leap back and try to stop the strangler earlier? Why, for the same reasons listed above – the Killing Hitler risk, the fact that there was nobody to leap into, and his secondary mission of saving Michelle’s emotional life. It really does appear that there is method to the madness of this Grand Design (if it exists).

This brings me to the final part of my segment, and I’d like to discuss how I see the Grand Design. There are four physical dimensions (length, breadth, depth and time), but since in the Quantum Leap Universe, time is able to be manipulated, I think there must be some fifth dimension, which the controller of the Grand Design must be in (and whoever is messing it up). If you have trouble picturing this, I’d advise you to watch “Men In Black 3”, there is what they call a “fifth dimensional being” who can see all possible events in all possible times over any area. Sam’s theory on time travel is what he calls his “string theory”, that each life can be thought of like a string, with one end being birth, and the other, death, and that by joining the ends and then balling up the string, the days of one’s life cross over each other, enabling days to be skipped over. I think that the Grand Design might also be a string, with everything that happens, in ALL timelines, already printed on it. The time-travel aspect could simply be the same as Sam’s theory, with the string being joined and balled up, or rather, smaller loops being created. When Sam travels in time, the string moves back over itself, and once Sam changes history, a loop in the string appears. Everyone in the string only experiences going over the leap caused by the string crossing over itself, and the history that is erased or changed ends up in the resulting loop that gets skipped over.

So that is how I view the Grand Design, everybody has a destiny to fulfil, it’s just that sometimes GTFW needs help cleaning up the mess that something else is creating, which is where Sam comes in. The “destiny string” is balled over, and the part of history that needs fixing is just skipped over. Sam can’t help everyone, but those he does help end up touching others in ways we can’t even imagine.
Thank you to Sarah for sharing her thoughts with me when I asked for input on the Facebook page, she too believed that Michelle was destined for greatness. If you have any thoughts about something I’ve talked about or will talk about, please let me know, I’d love to hear from you. Also if you have any suggestions for something to discuss, I’d love to hear that too. ‘Til next time, may you all take a “Leap of Faith” and fulfil your roles in the Grand Design  ~Hayden
 
Bestie just told me about this 1956 film she's watching called 'The Bad Seed' a plot which the Trilogy Episodes of QL mimic and Abigail is even a look alike to the character in the film.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1001572-bad_seed/

Does anyone know if this film was in fact Deborah Pratt's inspiration for the Trilogy episodes or just an astounding coincidence?

I think the movie was very likely Pratt's inspiration, at least partly. She certainly seemed to be aiming for that same vibe in the first Trilogy episode. She changed the coveted item from a penmanship medal to a locket.

It's been a while since I've seen the 1956 version of the film but I remember it getting pretty campy, and the ending was changed from the book to make it more palatable to audiences of the time.
 
I realised something about "The Leap Back".

Al was born in 1934. He had sex with Suzanne in 1945. If he had gotten her pregnant, that would mean he'd have a child that's only 11 years younger than he is :p
 
blue enigma said:
It's been a while since I've seen the 1956 version of the film but I remember it getting pretty campy, and the ending was changed from the book to make it more palatable to audiences of the time.

So it was a book as well? Interesting.
I'm interested in seeing this film now just out of curiosity.

I realised something about "The Leap Back".

Al was born in 1934. He had sex with Suzanne in 1945. If he had gotten her pregnant, that would mean he'd have a child that's only 11 years younger than he is :p

Actually that's exactly what happened with Sam in Trilogy part 2. Sam conceived with Abigail in 1965 making him 12 years older than his daughter Sammy-Jo. He was 12 years old in 1965, probably the world's youngest father. You dirty dog Sam! Haha.
 
I realised something about "The Leap Back".

Al was born in 1934. He had sex with Suzanne in 1945. If he had gotten her pregnant, that would mean he'd have a child that's only 11 years younger than he is :p

Which isn't much less than the age difference between Sam and Sammy Jo Fuller, although Sam was a teenager when Sammy Jo was born - just. :p
 
So it was a book as well? Interesting.
I'm interested in seeing this film now just out of curiosity.

It was originally a book by William March, then it was adapted as a Broadway play and then the 1956 movie was made. Patty McCormack played the little girl in both the play and the movie.

Actually that's exactly what happened with Sam in Trilogy part 2. Sam conceived Sammy-Jo with Abigail in 1965 making his 12 year old self of the time a father.

lol we were on the same page on this one, though I had the date wrong. I thought Sammy Jo was born in 1966 and Sam was already 13.
 
How's this for a spinout:

If Sam had had sex with his great grandmother when he leapt to the Civil War, he could have ended up being his own great grandfather :p

funny_celebrity_pictures_he_is_his_own_grandpa_futurama_pic_dump-s492x454-139419-580.jpg
 
Except that would not have happened because he knew better than to let himself get that close. Now had they never determined that Olivia Covington was his great grandmother...true that leap could have gone a whole different way...down creepy road. XD
 
Except that would not have happened because he knew better than to let himself get that close. Now had they never determined that Olivia Covington was his great grandmother...true that leap could have gone a whole different way...down creepy road. XD

Well if he hadn't found out until he'd done the deed it would make sense in story... And it would also explain why his great grandfather's DNA is a match for his own - since it WOULD have been his own DNA :p
 
Well if he hadn't found out until he'd done the deed it would make sense in story... And it would also explain why his great grandfather's DNA is a match for his own - since it WOULD have been his own DNA :p

Actually no.
Had he conceived his grandfather instead of Captain John Beckett, Captain John Beckett would not have been his great grandfather, he'd be his own great grandfather.
Unless you want to get into the body/soul debate. Personally I do not, I know where I stand with that and I've voiced it enough times.
See my Random Measures review if you've never seen any of my body vs. soul posts.
 
what are you all talkin about sam knew that woman was his granny and even if he didnt know it ziggy would make sure he found out.i mean if you could go back in time would you have sex with your granny?:banghead:banghead
 
what are you all talkin about sam knew that woman was his granny and even if he didnt know it ziggy would make sure he found out.i mean if you could go back in time would you have sex with your granny?:banghead:banghead

No, I am saying that if they really wanted to mess with the viewer's heads, they would have had it happen BEFORE Al tells him that she's his granny :p
 
Leaper, Lightning McQueenie is only exploring a hypothetical scenario.
You are correct though, once it was identified that Captain John Beckett was his great grandfather Olivia Covington would come with the data. So there was no avoiding it because there was no avoiding DNA testing John since it was needed to determine the means of Sam leaping outside his lifetime.
 
I especially love the episode "Leap Between the States" because it gave us a possible way for Sam to leap outside his lifetime or into a situation he normally wouldn't be able to. I've read some fanfiction of him leaping into a great uncle during World War 1 using the same logic, and also another with him leaping into Ziggy (he could do this because part of himself is in Ziggy). Since then I haven't been able to find either story :( if anyone is able to help me, please do :)
 
It is quite a clever concept.

There is also a published Novel in which Sam leaps into his ancestry, much farther back then Leap Between the States.

Independence by John Peel features Sam leaping into Samuel Beckett his several times great grandfather during the Revolutionary War era. While needing to keep an eye on his ancestor's closest friend whose life he must save, he also falls very in love with his ancestor's wife who heavily resembles Donna to the point where its excruciatingly difficult for him to refuse her when she wants sex and even just to sleep beside her.

It's very well done.
 
Ah watching 'Black on White on Fire' and totally forgot the indication that Sam remembers Donna in this episode.

She loves him so much, Al.
When she looks at me,
I feel like she wants to just...
crawl inside and never come out.
There was only one woman
that ever looked at me like that.
 
Ah watching 'Black on White on Fire' and totally forgot the indication that Sam remembers Donna in this episode.

She loves him so much, Al.
When she looks at me,
I feel like she wants to just...
crawl inside and never come out.
There was only one woman
that ever looked at me like that.

If it was Donna that is :p
 
If it was Donna that is :p

Right but I can't think of who else, it seems kind of pointless that they'd throw in that line in reference to a random woman we don't ever even know about. But then again it is Bellisario who was known for giving the 'everything is subject to change' excuse and see my Obsessions review where I discover that there is a lot of evidence that there wasn't much interest in developing the idea of Donna in comparison to the references to Beth being special to Al.
 
Right but I can't think of who else, it seems kind of pointless that they'd throw in that line in reference to a random woman we don't ever even know about. But then again it is Bellisario who was known for giving the 'everything is subject to change' excuse and see my Obsessions review where I discover that there is a lot of evidence that there wasn't much interest in developing the idea of Donna in comparison to the references to Beth being special to Al.

We definitely know it wasn't Abigail or Tamlyn since they came much later (and Abigail didn't see Sam). And I doubt 25-year-old Nicole was looking at 15-year-old Sam that way while she was teaching him piano (I hope not anyway). Lisa is the only other woman from Sam's past if I remember correctly. But assuming there was no unnamed woman we never heard about in Sam's past, my guess if I had to choose between Donna or Lisa is the quote refers to Donna (even if they did do a lousy job at meaningfully building up the relationship between her and Sam).
 
We definitely know it wasn't Abigail or Tamlyn since they came much later (and Abigail didn't see Sam). And I doubt 25-year-old Nicole was looking at 15-year-old Sam that way while she was teaching him piano (I hope not anyway). Lisa is the only other woman from Sam's past if I remember correctly. But assuming there was no unnamed woman we never heard about in Sam's past, my guess if I had to choose between Donna or Lisa is the quote refers to Donna (even if they did do a lousy job at meaningfully building up the relationship between her and Sam).

Perfectly deducted, I agree wholeheartedly. Especially since we know Lisa didn't have much of an interest in him, she kinda teased his crush on her actually so I doubt she ever directed a 'crawl inside and never come out' look towards him.
 
I agree that there's about a 99% chance that it's Donna he was talking about (especially because he couldn't really recall who that person was - again backing up my theory that Sam has subconsciously blocked Donna out).

I was just making the point that, despite him refusing to have sex with anyone he didn't love, with how quickly and how often he does fall in love, that it's quite plausible that in his time he has split a lot of women in half ;) so there is still a chance he may have been talking about someone else.

Another possibility is he may remember how Diane McBride looked at him when she thought he was her husband.

On a completely unrelated topic, today is Bruce McGill's (Weird Ernie / Al the Bartender) birthday. Here's hoping we can one day arrange an interview with him for the Quantum Leap Podcast :D
 
Something I recently thought of - in Camikazi Kid, why didn't Sam leap into wearing braces like his host? They were clearly visible on Cam hahaha.
 
Probably because that would have taken a lot of work and it was the first season, so a lot of concepts were still being developed like the Imagining Chamber door. Notice in the first few episodes it opened on the side like a standard door in a home rather than sliding up.
 
An in-universe reason: Permanent or semi-permanent attachments to the human body probably do leap out to the Waiting Room if Sam leaps in - such as breast implants, pacemakers, hip replacements. Braces are a semi-permanent attachment, so they can be considered a part of the human body and so would leap out as well. Same reason why the bullet inside Zoe leapt out with her as well I expect...
 
Excellent logic which also fit's as a solution to the confusion over Billy Jean's baby (which I'd always thought). It too would be considered a semi-permanent attachment via the umbilical chord.

In regards to Zoey, I agree. She had to have taken that bullet with her, how else would her leapee have returned unharmed?

This also clarifies the moment in Dr. Ruth where Al presented her with a duplication they'd created of her glasses.
True we had a contradicting portrayal of a leapee with glasses early in the series in season 1's How the Tess was Won but that was obviously a unique situation for two reasons:
1.) It was the first season and as I've pointed out before the concepts were not developed.
2.) The presence of Sam wearing glasses in this leap would have ruined the intentional mystery of the reflection. The viewer wasn't supposed to know why the other characters looked down at Doc.
 
I think we can all agree that there's no way the baby can have stayed inside Sam, it just could not survive. The question is, what happened to the baby?

I think that it ended up in the safety of limbo :)
 
Limbo makes the most sense, the same which would have had to happen to Alia's bullet in Revenge since it hit the leap light not her. This is a concept Tina even suggests in the novel Foreknowledge and that this must be what happens to Sam in between leaps.
 
Limbo makes the most sense, the same which would have had to happen to Alia's bullet in Revenge since it hit the leap light not her. This is a concept Tina even suggests in the novel Foreknowledge and that this must be what happens to Sam in between leaps.

Limbo is one possibility. Sam also may simply be moving through the time stream in between leaps (or the space/time continuum). He is a time traveler and is traveling in body ( :) ); it's plausible to assume there is some kind of movement from time to time and place to place.

I'm not as much of a fan of the '8-1/2 Months' episode as other QL fans, though I like that they attempted to tackle the issues that they did here and it's definitely one of the better mpreg stories I've seen on television. So I never really thought about the science behind exactly what happened with Billie Jean's baby, other than for whatever reason the baby leaped out before Sam and Billie Jean did. You've all offered some interesting theories to explain it.
 
8-1/2 Months isn't my all time favorite QL episode, but the idea of Sam leaping into a pregnant girl was an interesting one...And as usual his response when he realized what was happening was priceless. His line to the doctor/medical staff: "I am not going to have this baby, believe me" (or something to that effect) was a great one. And then when he had his cravings and he was in labor just before he leapt. LOL. The limbo theory makes sense; of course they had to do something. A man having a baby is just too far out a concept, and it hasn't worked in films or television as Blue Enigma pointed out.
 
Agreed, 8 1/2 Months while the humor was very enjoyable (how can it not be?) doesn't sit right with me for it's negative message that it's ok for a teenager to be a parent and in doing so making a statement against adoption. My best friend's younger sister is adopted so it's a strong subject for us.
Though we do appreciate that they gave Sam a line stating that he supports adoption so at least we know that he didn't completely agree with this leap and what he was doing.

Still there are much more positive ways they could have leaped Sam into a pregnant female. Or a more sensible way to have written the Billy Jean concept because teen pregnancy is a very good subject for Quantum Leap , this particular execution was just poor.
 
There's nothing at all wrong with adoption. There are some girls who keep their babies and do okay though. In those cases they probably have a lot of support from family. Raising a child is a lot of work in the best of circumstances though, so I can understand why girls would choose to give their babies up for adoption.

It's been awhile since I've watched the episode, but if I'm remembering right, in the original history Billie Jean gives up her baby and regrets it. And part of the purpose of the leap was to reconcile her with her father also I think.
 
That's just it.
Billy Jean's circumstances were NOT supportive. No one wanted her (Sam) to keep that baby and she's in high school she can't even support herself. The father didn't want HER let alone, that one woman was kind enough to put her up but even she didn't want that baby until she was thrown together with the father at the end with good reason. She was actually the one it was least fair to ask.
So you can feel that it shouldn't have worked.

Regret or no it doesn't sound like such a wrong. Sorry.

You are right though under the right circumstances I might have bought it. For example had the reconcile with the father been the primary objective and keeping the baby just happened to be a bi product of that it would have worked.
 
It's been awhile since I've watched the episode, but if I'm remembering right, in the original history Billie Jean gives up her baby and regrets it. And part of the purpose of the leap was to reconcile her with her father also I think.

Yes, that's right. In the original history she regretted giving up the baby and spent her life looking for the child. That's what Sam was there to change. Reconciling her with her father was both part of making that happen as well as being in and of itself a separate purpose of the leap.
 
We all know that Billy Jean regretted giving up her baby, but I'm trying to point out that that doesn't make it a wrong. She had no freaking support system and had no salary! She was a teenager! She would not have been able to care for that baby.
Changing the circumstances so that she could keep the baby was not really a more sensible route for her. She needed to finish her education and get a good job.

That's not my opinion but to each their own.
 
We all know that Billy Jean regretted giving up her baby, but I'm trying to point out that that doesn't make it a wrong. She had no freaking support system and had no salary! She was a teenager! She would not have been able to care for that baby. Changing the circumstances so that she could keep the baby was not really a more sensible route for her. She needed to finish her education and get a good job.

In this case I think it was a wrong though. From what we see of the reaction of people around her, including the kid who is the father, she had a lot of pressure from everyone to put the baby up for adoption. Maybe I'm reading more into it than is there but it seems to me like there was an element of coercion to her decision - maybe she chose to put the baby up for adoption because of that pressure from everyone but in her heart never felt it was the right decision. From what little we see she put everyone's interests and well-being above her own (deciding it was more important for the kid who was the father to finish his education than for her to finish hers, etc.). And keeping her baby didn't necessarily mean she couldn't finish her education and get a good job. Sam changing her circumstances made both possible - her father was in her life and willing to help support her/raise the baby.

I agree with you that there were problems with the way it was executed, and whether it was intentional or not, some of Sam's own privilege and prejudices and insistence on his own world view come through in this episode. Maybe it would've read better if the primary purpose of the leap was to reconcile Billie Jean and her father, the outcome being that not only would that relationship be saved but there'd be the ripple effect of her being able to keep the baby and improve her own life too.
 
There's another possibility. What if in the original history, the baby's adoptive family was abusive or neglectful? It could actually be the case that Sam had to help Billie-Jean keep the baby to keep it away from such a life...
 
There's another possibility. What if in the original history, the baby's adoptive family was abusive or neglectful? It could actually be the case that Sam had to help Billie-Jean keep the baby to keep it away from such a life...

That's an excellent point too. Sam and Al have no idea what happened to the baby, other than it was adopted. Sam acted on instinct and intuition in leaps, especially in later leaps, and no doubt had a gut feeling that this is what he needed to do for Billie Jean.
 
In this case I think it was a wrong though. From what we see of the reaction of people around her, including the kid who is the father, she had a lot of pressure from everyone to put the baby up for adoption. Maybe I'm reading more into it than is there but it seems to me like there was an element of coercion to her decision - maybe she chose to put the baby up for adoption because of that pressure from everyone but in her heart never felt it was the right decision. From what little we see she put everyone's interests and well-being above her own (deciding it was more important for the kid who was the father to finish his education than for her to finish hers, etc.). And keeping her baby didn't necessarily mean she couldn't finish her education and get a good job. Sam changing her circumstances made both possible - her father was in her life and willing to help support her/raise the baby.

Once again you are missing my point which I continue to stand by.
Speaking of the original history where she has absolutely no support system, she would not have been able to care for that baby so pressure plays no role it was still the better option.
Even in with the changed circumstances most of the responsibility was on the father and the other woman who'd married him at least until Billy Jean finished high school but maybe longer. That's not very fair, to expect that of them even though they graciously accepted. Billy Jean (or rather Sam) was the one putting on the pressure now.

I agree with you that there were problems with the way it was executed, and whether it was intentional or not, some of Sam's own privilege and prejudices and insistence on his own world view come through in this episode. Maybe it would've read better if the primary purpose of the leap was to reconcile Billie Jean and her father, the outcome being that not only would that relationship be saved but there'd be the ripple effect of her being able to keep the baby and improve her own life too.

Actually I disagree that Sam approached this one based on his own belief system and opinions. It was clearly stated that he'd felt for the present Billy Jean who longed for her child and that he wasn't against adoption. If it were his daughter (Sammy Jo if you will) in this situation, as a father this certainly wouldn't have been his approach.

Though I do agree that the reconcile with the father was a valid task and should have been the primary with her being able to keep the child being a product of that. THAT I would have bought.

There's another possibility. What if in the original history, the baby's adoptive family was abusive or neglectful? It could actually be the case that Sam had to help Billie-Jean keep the baby to keep it away from such a life...

It's literally not possible for her to find that out.
Back then open adoption didn't exist and the records were sealed tight so that I think even policemen were denied access without going through a complex process.
Not only would Billy Jean not have been able to so much as write a letter but even in the present (where PQL exists, the 90's) she'd gone against the law to even seek the child out.

Even Ziggy couldn't determine that for sure as all she'd be able to find if anything are reports and suspicious hospital visits. So only speculation could be achieved.
 
Last edited:
Once again you are missing my point which I continue to stand by.

I get your point. I just don't agree 100% with it. The whole point of Sam being there was to change things so she would have a support system. As with many other leaps things got worse when Sam set them into motion before they got better. As we said, it might've been better had the purpose been the reconciliation and then the rest fell into place. But Sam often had instincts about what needed to be done on a leap, even when it didn't seem to make sense.

Actually I disagree that Sam approached this one based on his own belief system and opinions. It was clearly stated that he'd felt for the present Billy Jean who longed for her child and that he wasn't against adoption. If it were his daughter (Sammy Jo if you will) in this situation, as a father this certainly wouldn't have been his approach.

I'm not just talking about his belief about adoption. I'm referring to a much more deep-rooted worldview and its subtleties that he brings to this leap.
 
I get your point. I just don't agree 100% with it. The whole point of Sam being there was to change things so she would have a support system. As with many other leaps things got worse when Sam set them into motion before they got better. As we said, it might've been better had the purpose been the reconciliation and then the rest fell into place. But Sam often had instincts about what needed to be done on a leap, even when it didn't seem to make sense.

It still wasn't very fair to the father and the new wife, the way they were kind of coaxed into being that support.
Though apparently they'd come around to agreeing to support her it still wasn't their responsibility to be obligated to. It was asking them to fix her problem.
In the original timeline she'd have been on the streets with that baby unable to feed herself let alone! Thus her regret invalid and stupid! Before Sam there was no way she could have supported that baby.

You always have very well thought out viewpoints which I admire and respect Blue Enigma, this is no different and most of the time we happen to be on the same page but we're gonna have to agree to disagree on this one.

I'm not just talking about his belief about adoption. I'm referring to a much more deep-rooted worldview and its subtleties that he brings to this leap.

Can you please elaborate?
 
It's literally not possible for her to find that out.
Back then open adoption didn't exist and the records were sealed tight so that I think even policemen were denied access without going through a complex process.
Not only would Billy Jean not have been able to so much as write a letter but even in the present (where PQL exists, the 90's) she'd gone against the law to even seek the child out.

But GOD knows what happened to the baby. It was in His/Her infinite wisdom that it was a mistake for the baby to be adopted out, which is why Sam was there in the first place. Sam realised this, and probably wouldn't have even needed Ziggy to come up with the same scenario.

In fact, this probably explains why Sam felt the pregnancy symptoms. They were needed so that he would know how a mother feels about their baby, and help him to come to the right conclusion. You could see that even having only "carried" the baby for a couple of days, his heart was breaking at the thought of the baby being separated from its mother, and he realised that the baby needed to be with its mother.

This leap is one where Sam had to trust his instincts. You're right, it's not logical, but it's emotional, and has the backup of the highest power.
 
Lightning McQueenie said:
and he realised that the baby needed to be with its mother.

The baby needed to be with whomever could properly care for it.
Have you even seen the film Juno? Now THAT was a smart teen pregnancy story, had they executed this more like that it would have been more positive. It even supports single mothers which is kinda personal to me because I was raised by one.

If Billy Jean's child truly was put in an abusive home than the objective should have been to have Sam leap into the agency to change the placement of the child. A wrongful placement doesn't necessarily mean that the mother keeping the child is the ideal alternative and I still stand by that it wasn't in Billy Jean's situation before Sam or rather the young black girl had gotten her father to support her. It would have helped if they'd said what happened to the child in the original history.

You're right this was an emotional based task, too much so that it was inappropriate for this issue however I do not fault Sam for his sympathy. It's who he is and he could have somewhere in his heart been considering his own missed chance to be a parent whether from the angle of Donna standing him up at the alter or simply that he's trapped in a world where no one knows who he is.